Model comparison
Grok 3 vs Trinity Large Thinking
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Arcee AISummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 6 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 3 leads 41.9 to 34.1.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1381 |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Trinity Large Thinking leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1350 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | — |
Math Too close to call
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | 6.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1360 |
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1334 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |
Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1355 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1342 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 34.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Trinity Large Thinking share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.