Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

Step 3.5 Flash StepFun

41.7

Rank #116 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 3 categories and Step 3.5 Flash in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3.5 Flash leads 21.2 to 13.8.
  • Step 3.5 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Step 3.5 Flash specifications
Grok 3Step 3.5 Flash
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index39.641.7
Released2025-04-092026-01-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked4019

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok 3: 41.5 (#113), Step 3.5 Flash: 41.7 (#106)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Coding14321436
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.2 (#69), Step 3.5 Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 3: 13.8 (#322), Step 3.5 Flash: 21.2 (#202)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts14331411
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
NYT Connections (extended)—28.4%
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.34—

Math Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 3: 36.2 (#122), Step 3.5 Flash: 40.6 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Math13901408
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—66.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.0 (#76), Step 3.5 Flash: 39.0 (#127)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Expert14201422
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.5 (#81), Step 3.5 Flash: 50.7 (#115)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Non-English14111386
LMArena Chinese14481448
LMArena French14601421
LMArena German14311404
LMArena Japanese13891353
LMArena Korean13741350
LMArena Russian14161385
LMArena Spanish14171419

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.2 (#69), Step 3.5 Flash: 73.3 (#119)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Instruction Following14091385
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#187), Step 3.5 Flash: 42.8 (#112)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Longer Query14391402
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Step 3.5 Flash leads

Grok 3: 56.0 (#136), Step 3.5 Flash: 59.0 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text14261403
LMArena Creative Writing14141357
LMArena Multi-Turn14241405
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Step 3.5 Flash?

Step 3.5 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Step 3.5 Flash better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.5 vs 41.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Step 3.5 Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.5 Flash has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper