Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.6

Rank #150 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.9

Rank #112 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.6 27B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 47.5 to 36.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 55.6% for Grok 3 and 91.1% for Qwen3.6 27B.
  • Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Qwen3.6 27B specifications
Grok 3Qwen3.6 27B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.641.9
Released2025-04-092026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked4011

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.5 (#113), Qwen3.6 27B: 38.5 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
SciCode—37.3%
WeirdML37.2%—
LMArena Coding1432—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.2 (#69), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3.6 27B leads

Grok 3: 13.8 (#322), Qwen3.6 27B: 24.4 (#148)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
Epoch Capabilities Index138.34146.47
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
CritPt—0.9%
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1433—
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—78.1%
LMCA—34.5%

Math Qwen3.6 27B leads

Grok 3: 36.2 (#122), Qwen3.6 27B: 47.5 (#56)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%91.1%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—35.1%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LMArena Math1390—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads

Grok 3: 46.0 (#76), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond75.8%85.9%
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
LMArena Expert1420—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 3: 52.5 (#81), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Non-English1411—
LMArena Chinese1448—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1389—
LMArena Korean1374—
LMArena Russian1416—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 3: 75.2 (#69), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
IFEval88.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1409—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 3: 38.7 (#187), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1439—

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 56.0 (#136), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#180)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Text1426—
LMArena Creative Writing1414—
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
EQ-Bench 4—1026
LMArena Multi-Turn1424—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.9 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3.6 27B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper