Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Qwen3-1.7B

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 1 category; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 19.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 55.6% for Grok 3 and 8.1% for Qwen3-1.7B.
  • Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Grok 3Qwen3-1.7B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index39.926.6
Released2025-04-092025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked404

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—
LMArena Coding1432—

Agentic & Tool Use Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1434—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%8.1%
Omni-MATH46.4%—
LMArena Math1391—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond75.8%38%
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—
LMArena Expert1421—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1410—
LMArena Chinese1448—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—
LMArena Russian1416—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
IFEval88.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1409—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1439—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Qwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1426—
LMArena Creative Writing1414—
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1425—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Qwen3-1.7B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper