Model comparison
Grok 3 vs o3
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 38 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 38 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 2 categories and o3 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where o3 leads 32.0 to 13.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 5.5% for Grok 3 and 60.8% for o3.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 47.5 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8 |
| Results tracked | 40 | 63 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3 leads
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), o3: 46.8 (#64)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | 81.3% |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | 52.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |
Agentic & Tool Use o3 leads
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), o3: 34.5 (#44)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |
Reasoning o3 leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), o3: 32.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | 60.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1402 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | 146.86 |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |
Math o3 leads
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), o3: 50.2 (#58)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | 71.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | 1426 |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | 2.1% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
Knowledge o3 leads
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), o3: 54.6 (#52)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | 81.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | 75.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | 1402 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 3: —, o3: 41.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), o3: 51.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1401 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | 1437 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1430 |
| LMArena German | 1431 | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | 1406 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1395 |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), o3: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 88.4% | 86.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1368 |
Long Context o3 leads
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), o3: 53.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | 88.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1372 |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |
Writing & Preference o3 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), o3: 63.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1359 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | 1676 |
| WildBench | 84.9% | 86.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1405 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than o3?
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or o3 better for coding?
o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 41.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and o3 share?
38 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.