Model comparison

Grok 3 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok 3 xAI

39.9

Rank #157 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 3 leads 46.2 to 34.1.
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 3 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct specifications
Grok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderxAINVIDIA
Noometry Index39.937.6
Released2025-04-092024-12-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4014

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Coding14321272
Aider Polyglot53.3%—
WeirdML37.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—48.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
BALROG29.5%—

Reasoning Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct leads

Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14341266
ARC-AGI-20%—
SimpleBench36.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-15.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index138.33—

Math Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math13911271
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202555.6%—
Omni-MATH46.4%—
MATH Level 588.7%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)3.8%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert14211242
GPQA Diamond75.8%—
MMLU-Pro78.8%—
Confabulations14.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.8%—
GPQA (HELM)65%—

Multilingual Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14101245
LMArena Chinese14481263
LMArena Russian14161227
LMArena French1460—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1387—
LMArena Korean1373—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14091252
IFEval88.4%—

Long Context Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14391238
Fiction.LiveBench58.3%—

Writing & Preference Grok 3 leads

Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 3Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text14261283
LMArena Creative Writing14141269
LMArena Multi-Turn14251275
Short-Story Creative Writing76.4%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1186—
WildBench84.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 3 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Grok 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 3 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper