Model comparison
Grok 3 vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 3 scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 28.9 to 13.7.
Side by side
| Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 39.9 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 40 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Grok 3: 41.9 (#115), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1432 | 1418 |
| Aider Polyglot | 53.3% | — |
| WeirdML | 37.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 3: 30.5 (#76), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok 3: 13.7 (#333), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1416 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 36.1% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 138.33 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 3: 38.0 (#145), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 55.6% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 46.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1391 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 88.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 3.8% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 0% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 3: 46.2 (#82), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 75.8% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 78.8% | — |
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 65% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1421 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 3: —, Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 52.3 (#87), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1410 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1448 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena German | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1387 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1373 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 3 leads
Grok 3: 75.0 (#73), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1409 | 1397 |
| IFEval | 88.4% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok 3: 38.7 (#192), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1439 | 1404 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 58.3% | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Grok 3: 55.8 (#141), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Grok 3 | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1426 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1414 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1425 | 1422 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 76.4% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1186 | — |
| WildBench | 84.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 3 better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 3 or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (41.9 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Grok 3 and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 3 has 40 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.