Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 7 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 25.9 to 13.6.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Grok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index41.239.2
Released2025-04-09—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding13791316
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts13751299
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math13861304
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert13951279
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English13521290
LMArena Chinese13871331
LMArena Russian13531324
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1335—
LMArena Spanish1381—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following13571287
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query13721307
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Too close to call

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text13701321
LMArena Creative Writing13421328
LMArena Multi-Turn13551292
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper