Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 21 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #67 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 21 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 34.5 to 13.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 61.3% for Grok-3 mini and 73.7% for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.
  • Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B specifications
Grok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.246.0
Released2025-04-092026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked3536

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Coding13791465
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
LMArena WebDev—1400
WeirdML42.6%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
APEX-Agents—24.9%
τ²-bench Airline—81.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—84.4%
τ²-bench Telecom—97.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%73.7%
LMArena Hard Prompts13751448
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35146.65
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—58.9%
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
Chess Puzzles—13%
Thematic Generalization—65.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.9%

Math Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%88.9%
LMArena Math13861454
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—31.2%
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
GPQA Diamond76.3%86.4%
LMArena Expert13951462
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Vision—1263

Multilingual Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Non-English13521430
LMArena Chinese13871500
LMArena French13571461
LMArena German13491447
LMArena Japanese13421426
LMArena Korean13351384
LMArena Russian13531429
LMArena Spanish13811441

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Instruction Following13571424
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Longer Query13721442
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Text13701438
LMArena Creative Writing13421401
LMArena Multi-Turn13551446
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1478
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

21 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper