Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.4 to 18.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MMLU-Pro: 79.9% for Grok-3 mini and 31% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
  • OLMo 2 Furious 13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B specifications
Grok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ProviderxAIAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index41.229.7
Released2025-04-092024-12-31
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3512

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
WeirdML42.6%—
LiveBench Coding—10.4%
LMArena Coding1379—

Reasoning OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
ARC-AGI-20.4%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%—
ARC-AGI-116.5%—
LiveBench Reasoning—16.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1375—
LiveBench Data Analysis—20.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—
LiveBench—22.1%

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Omni-MATH31.8%15.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
LiveBench Math—13.6%
LMArena Math1386—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
MMLU-Pro79.9%31%
GPQA (HELM)67.5%31.6%
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
Confabulations10.8%—
LMArena Expert1395—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
LMArena Non-English1352—
LMArena Chinese1387—
LMArena French1357—
LMArena German1349—
LMArena Japanese1342—
LMArena Korean1335—
LMArena Russian1353—
LMArena Spanish1381—

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
IFEval95.1%73%
LiveBench Instruction Following—60.6%
LMArena Instruction Following1357—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—
LMArena Longer Query1372—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniOLMo 2 Furious 13B
WildBench65.1%68.9%
LMArena Text1370—
LMArena Creative Writing1342—
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1355—
LiveBench Language—11.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper