Model comparison

Grok-3 mini vs Magistral Medium

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok-3 mini xAI

41.2

Rank #141 Confirmed

Magistral Medium Mistral AI

35.2

Rank #227 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 8 categories and Magistral Medium in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-3 mini leads 46.4 to 33.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 61.3% for Grok-3 mini and 16.2% for Magistral Medium.
  • Magistral Medium has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-3 mini and Magistral Medium specifications
Grok-3 miniMagistral Medium
ProviderxAIMistral AI
Noometry Index41.235.2
Released2025-04-092025-03-17
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$5
Results tracked3522

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Coding13791319
Aider Polyglot49.3%—
SciCode—39.2%
WeirdML42.6%—

Reasoning Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
ARC-AGI-20.4%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark61.3%16.2%
ARC-AGI-116.5%6.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts13751267
CritPt—0.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—

Math Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Math13861250
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202577.8%—
Omni-MATH31.8%—
MATH Level 590.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)5.9%—

Knowledge Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Expert13951223
GPQA Diamond76.3%—
MMLU-Pro79.9%—
Confabulations10.8%—
GPQA (HELM)67.5%—

Multilingual Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13521232
LMArena Chinese13871227
LMArena French13571267
LMArena German13491248
LMArena Japanese13421175
LMArena Korean13351125
LMArena Russian13531224
LMArena Spanish13811271

Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following13571254
IFEval95.1%—

Long Context Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query13721295
Fiction.LiveBench66.7%—

Writing & Preference Grok-3 mini leads

Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-3 miniMagistral Medium
LMArena Text13701255
LMArena Creative Writing13421245
LMArena Multi-Turn13551275
Short-Story Creative Writing73.5%—
WildBench65.1%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-3 mini better than Magistral Medium?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 35.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-3 mini or Magistral Medium better for coding?

Grok-3 mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Magistral Medium share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.

Related comparisons

Go deeper