Model comparison
Grok-3 mini vs Grok 4.6
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 23 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-3 mini scores higher in 1 category and Grok 4.6 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 13.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 16.5% for Grok-3 mini and 87.5% for Grok 4.6.
Side by side
| Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 56.9 |
| Released | 2025-04-09 | 2026-08-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 49 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131), Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 42.6% | 67.3% |
| LMArena Coding | 1379 | 1465 |
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| Aider Polyglot | 49.3% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |
Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334), Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0.4% | 67.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 16.5% | 87.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1375 | 1447 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 140.35 | 156.44 |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 61.3% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
Math Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85), Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 77.8% | 99.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1386 | 1423 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| Omni-MATH | 31.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 90.9% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 5.9% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81), Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 94% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1467 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.9% | — |
| Confabulations | 10.8% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 67.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok-3 mini: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |
Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145), Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1352 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1387 | 1480 |
| LMArena French | 1357 | 1461 |
| LMArena German | 1349 | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1342 | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | 1335 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1353 | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1381 | 1404 |
Instruction Following Grok-3 mini leads
Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9), Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1357 | 1431 |
| IFEval | 95.1% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147), Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1372 | 1454 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads
Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169), Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)
| Benchmark | Grok-3 mini | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1370 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1342 | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1355 | 1425 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 73.5% | — |
| WildBench | 65.1% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-3 mini better than Grok 4.6?
Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-3 mini or Grok 4.6 better for coding?
Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 40.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-3 mini and Grok 4.6 share?
23 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-3 mini has 35 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.