Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Yi-34B

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.8

Rank #329 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 6 categories and Yi-34B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads 29.8 to 7.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 63.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 5.1% for Yi-34B.
  • Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Yi-34B specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
ProviderxAI01.AI
Noometry Index33.727.8
Released2024-08-132023-11-02
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3423

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Coding12871112
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Yi-34B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts12721104
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48117.39
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Math12831114
MATH Level 563.5%5.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
GPQA Diamond53.8%14.7%
LMArena Expert12541061
Confabulations20.1%—
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Non-English12821079
LMArena Chinese12891176
LMArena French13181081
LMArena German12871042
LMArena Japanese1244993
LMArena Korean1237959
LMArena Russian12861050
LMArena Spanish12811070

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12701091
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Longer Query12761094

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Yi-34B
LMArena Text13051129
LMArena Creative Writing12841108
LMArena Multi-Turn12901113
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Yi-34B?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Yi-34B better for coding?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Yi-34B share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper