Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Step 3.7 Flash

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Step 3.7 Flash StepFun

37.3

Rank #207 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 20.8.
  • Step 3.7 Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Step 3.7 Flash specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
ProviderxAIStepFun
Noometry Index33.737.3
Released2024-08-132026-05-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—256K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$1.11
Results tracked345

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
SciCode—40%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—
ALE-Bench—694.12

Reasoning Step 3.7 Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
SimpleBench22.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—39.7%
CritPt—2.3%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Step 3.7 Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—68.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Step 3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Step 3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Step 3.7 Flash?

Step 3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?

Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Step 3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.

Related comparisons

Go deeper