Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen3 8B

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 8B in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 8B leads 34.9 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.
  • Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3 8B specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.733.7
Released2024-08-132025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked3411

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
SciCode—22.6%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%

Reasoning Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
DTBench65.2%59.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48136.17
SimpleBench22.7%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
LMCA—8.8%
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen3 8B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%56.1%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond53.8%56.8%
Confabulations20.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3 8B
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen3 8B?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.3 vs 34.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3 8B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper