Noometry

Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 20.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 95.6% for Qwen3.7 Max.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.751.5
Released2024-08-132026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked3433

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding12871498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench22.7%70.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts12721483
DTBench65.2%92.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48153.68
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
LMCA—44%
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%95.6%
LMArena Math12831490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
ProofBench—26%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond53.8%90.9%
LMArena Expert12541488
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Confabulations20.1%—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English12821474
LMArena Chinese12891530
LMArena Russian12861484
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12701460
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query12761482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text13051476
LMArena Creative Writing12841449
LMArena Multi-Turn12901481
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3.7 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper