Noometry

Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 29.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 86.7% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.739.9
Released2024-08-132026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
LMArena Coding1287—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48144.64
SimpleBench22.7%—
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1272—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%86.7%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond53.8%82.3%
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1282—
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1270—

Long Context Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1276—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1305—
LMArena Creative Writing1284—
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1290—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper