Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Qwen1.5-110B

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

34.2

Rank #234 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 33.7 to 20.8.
  • Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen1.5-110B specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.734.2
Released2024-08-132024-04-25
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3420

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding12871184
WeirdML22.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
LiveBench Coding46.4%—
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts12721168
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
ForecastBench—57.7
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Qwen1.5-110B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math12831185
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert12541144
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English12821142
LMArena Chinese12891206
LMArena French13181151
LMArena German12871123
LMArena Japanese12441074
LMArena Korean12371044
LMArena Russian12861118
LMArena Spanish12811142

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following12701158
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query12761157

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Qwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text13051175
LMArena Creative Writing12841148
LMArena Multi-Turn12901160
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen1.5-110B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.7 vs 34.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (33.3 vs 33.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper