Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Mercury

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.6

Rank #199 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 4 categories and Mercury in 2 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Mercury leads 38.7 to 33.3.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mercury specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
ProviderxAIInception
Noometry Index33.737.6
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked349

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Mercury: 38.7 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
LMArena Coding12871322
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Mercury: 17.5 (#293)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
LMArena Hard Prompts12721285
SimpleBench22.7%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
LMArena Math1283—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—
LMArena Expert1254—

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Mercury: 41.6 (#206)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
LMArena Non-English12821260
LMArena Chinese1289—
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Russian1286—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Mercury: 65.2 (#224)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
LMArena Instruction Following12701239
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Mercury: 38.4 (#198)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
LMArena Longer Query12761266

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Mercury: 46.2 (#221)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Mercury
LMArena Text13051282
LMArena Creative Writing12841191
LMArena Multi-Turn12901282
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper