Model comparison

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) xAI

33.7

Rank #239 Confirmed

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 20.8.

Side by side

Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 specifications
Grok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index33.737.9
Released2024-08-13—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3412

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Coding12871270
WeirdML22.2%—
LiveBench Coding46.4%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Hard Prompts12721264
SimpleBench22.7%—
LiveBench Reasoning54.8%—
DTBench65.2%—
LiveBench Data Analysis54.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.48—
LiveBench54.3%—

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Math12831274
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202511.5%—
LiveBench Math54.9%—
MATH Level 563.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)0.7%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Expert12541248
GPQA Diamond53.8%—
Confabulations20.1%—

Multilingual Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Non-English12821262
LMArena Chinese12891319
LMArena Russian12861258
LMArena French1318—
LMArena German1287—
LMArena Japanese1244—
LMArena Korean1237—
LMArena Spanish1281—

Instruction Following Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Instruction Following12701245
LiveBench Instruction Following69.6%—

Long Context Too close to call

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Longer Query12761301

Writing & Preference Grok-2 (Dec 2024) leads

Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok-2 (Dec 2024)Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
LMArena Text13051274
LMArena Creative Writing12841242
LMArena Multi-Turn12901275
Short-Story Creative Writing63.6%—
LiveBench Language45.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper