Model comparison
Grok-2 (Dec 2024) vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 57.8 to 20.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 11.5% for Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and 98.1% for Grok 4.7.
Side by side
| Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 33.7 | 53.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 33.3 (#258), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1287 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
| WeirdML | 22.2% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 46.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 16.9 (#299), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | 1413 |
| DTBench | 65.2% | 96% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.48 | 153.53 |
| SimpleBench | 22.7% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 54.8% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 54.5% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| LiveBench | 54.3% | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 20.8 (#284), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 11.5% | 98.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1283 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
| LiveBench Math | 54.9% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 63.5% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.7% | — |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 29.8 (#233), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 53.8% | 92.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1254 | 1422 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
| Confabulations | 20.1% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 43.1 (#188), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1282 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1318 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1281 | 1400 |
| LMArena German | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1237 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 66.9 (#202), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1270 | 1404 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 69.6% | — |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 38.8 (#190), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Grok-2 (Dec 2024): 48.6 (#198), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Grok-2 (Dec 2024) | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1305 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1284 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1290 | 1393 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 63.6% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
| LiveBench Language | 45.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok-2 (Dec 2024) or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok-2 (Dec 2024) and Grok 4.7 share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok-2 (Dec 2024) has 34 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.