Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Ring-2.6-1T
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has enough public results to be ranked (#198); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Ant Group (inclusionAI)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 40.7 to 37.0.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 36.9 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2026-05-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Ring-2.6-1T leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |
Reasoning Ring-2.6-1T leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
Math Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Ring-2.6-1T: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Ring-2.6-1T?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has enough public results to be ranked (#198); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?
Ring-2.6-1T scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.7 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Ring-2.6-1T share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.