Model comparison

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.7

Rank #198 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.1

Rank #119 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads 60.0 to 47.3.
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B specifications
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.742.1
Released2024-08-132026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$3.20
Results tracked1727

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#162)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Coding12691436
LMArena WebDev—1360
SciCode—35.6%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 27.2 (#123)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Hard Prompts12551421
NYT Connections (extended)—51.7%
CritPt—0.9%
Thematic Generalization—51.2%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84.3%
LMCA—32.2%

Math Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.1 (#112)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Math12651432

Knowledge Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 38.8 (#142)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Expert12381432
Vectara Hallucination Rate—11.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 39.6 (#57)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Vision—1245

Multilingual Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 51.6 (#107)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Non-English12571400
LMArena Chinese12621462
LMArena French12861442
LMArena German12731426
LMArena Japanese12131367
LMArena Korean11951352
LMArena Russian12611400
LMArena Spanish12791424

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 73.8 (#115)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Instruction Following12451399

Long Context Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 43.0 (#109)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Longer Query12661410

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 122B-A10B leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: 60.0 (#105)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
LMArena Text12811417
LMArena Creative Writing12421368
LMArena Multi-Turn12651416

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3.5 122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen3.5 122B-A10B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 122B-A10B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper