Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3-1.7B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 32.8 to 15.4.
- Qwen3-1.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 26.2 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.5 (#108)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162), Qwen3-1.7B: 18.5 (#263)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | — |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185), Qwen3-1.7B: 15.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1265 | — |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#273)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | — |
| LMArena French | 1285 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1278 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1267 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.0 to 26.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.