Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 33.9 to 13.5.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1130 |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1155 |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1286 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | 1089 |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1116 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.