Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen1.5-14B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.3 to 33.6.
- Qwen1.5-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1138 |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1113 |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1125 |
Knowledge Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1147 |
| LMArena French | 1286 | 1116 |
| LMArena German | 1273 | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | 1085 |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1102 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen1.5-14B share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.