Model comparison
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen-14B
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads 47.3 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-08-13 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 37.0 (#199), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1071 |
Reasoning Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 24.8 (#159), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1255 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 35.4 (#185), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1265 | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.9 (#200), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1238 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.4 (#208), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1257 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1262 | 1077 |
| LMArena French | 1286 | — |
| LMArena German | 1273 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1195 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1279 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.5 (#220), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1031 |
Long Context Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#196), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1266 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 leads
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.3 (#211), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1281 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1265 | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen-14B?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.