Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Nemotron 3 Super

Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Super score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.5 vs 40.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Nemotron 3 Super NVIDIA

40.1

Rank #153 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 2 categories and Nemotron 3 Super in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 26.6 to 18.7.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.08 / $0.45 for Nemotron 3 Super.
  • Nemotron 3 Super accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Super specifications
Granite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
ProviderIBMNVIDIA
Noometry Index40.540.1
Released—2026-03-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.08
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$0.45
Results tracked1121

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Nemotron 3 Super: 39.4 (#158)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Coding13801403
SciCode—36%
WeirdML—38%
ALE-Bench—213.9

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Nemotron 3 Super: 18.7 (#276)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Hard Prompts13291386
NYT Connections (extended)—15.4%
CritPt—3.1%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 39.6 (#101)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.4%
LMArena Math—1380

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#139)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Expert13841398

Multilingual Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Nemotron 3 Super: 48.4 (#144)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Non-English13021355
LMArena Chinese13661432
LMArena Russian12851336
LMArena French—1405
LMArena German—1341
LMArena Spanish—1417

Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Nemotron 3 Super: 71.2 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Instruction Following13011347

Long Context Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#139)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Longer Query13241362

Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Super leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Nemotron 3 Super: 55.9 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BNemotron 3 Super
LMArena Text13201378
LMArena Creative Writing12361317
LMArena Multi-Turn13011369

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Nemotron 3 Super?

Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Super score almost the same on the Noometry Index (40.5 vs 40.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3 Super?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Super lists at $0.08 and $0.45.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 39.4 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Super does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Nemotron 3 Super share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper