Model comparison
Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral Small
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 38.4 to 31.0.
- Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.15 / $0.60 for Mistral Small.
- Mistral Small accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 40.5 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-26 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 262K |
| Max output | 118K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.15 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.25 | $0.60 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1380 | 1362 |
| SciCode | — | 26.5% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 36.1% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 36.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.6% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 497.62 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.2 8B: —, Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 37.1% |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1329 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 37.8% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 44.8% |
| DTBench | — | 70.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 53.7% |
| LMCA | — | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | — | 44% |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 8B: —, Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 5.8% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 39.9% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1341 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.8% |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1384 | 1291 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.1% |
| MMLU | — | 68.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 8B: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1142 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1302 | 1315 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1366 | 1340 |
| LMArena Russian | 1285 | 1324 |
| LMArena French | — | 1337 |
| LMArena German | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1259 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1346 |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1301 | 1310 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 63.7% |
Long Context Too close to call
Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1327 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads
Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 8B | Mistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1320 | 1338 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1236 | 1305 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1301 | 1344 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 30.5% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Mistral Small?
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Mistral Small?
Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Mistral Small lists at $0.15 and $0.60.
Is Granite 4.2 8B or Mistral Small better for coding?
Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Small does, with 262K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Mistral Small share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.