Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Mistral 7B

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.0

Rank #143 Confirmed

Mistral 7B Mistral AI

22.9

Rank #346 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral 7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 37.7 to 7.3.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.25 / $0.25 for Mistral 7B.
  • Granite 4.2 8B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 8K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Mistral 7B specifications
Granite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index40.022.9
Released—2023-09-27
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K8K
Max output118K8K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.25
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$0.25
Results tracked1137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138), Mistral 7B: 25.9 (#321)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Coding13791082
BigCodeBench Instruct—19.5%
BigCodeBench Complete—27.3%
HumanEval+—36%
MBPP+—42.1%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130), Mistral 7B: 12.6 (#331)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13271067
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—42.5%
Adversarial NLI—47.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—56.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—111.97
HellaSwag—81%
PIQA—83%
WinoGrande—75.3%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Mistral 7B: 7.6 (#319)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0.3%
LMArena Math—1085
MATH Level 5—3.7%
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144), Mistral 7B: 7.3 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Expert13801036
GPQA Diamond—15.2%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.6%
BoolQ—87.4%
MMLU—62.5%
OpenBookQA—79.8%
TriviaQA—75.2%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173), Mistral 7B: 26.0 (#278)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Non-English12991012
LMArena Chinese13611009
LMArena Russian12831018
LMArena French—1036
LMArena German—987
LMArena Japanese—878
LMArena Spanish—1026

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183), Mistral 7B: 54.5 (#275)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Instruction Following12981060

Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154), Mistral 7B: 32.2 (#266)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Longer Query13231060

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183), Mistral 7B: 30.9 (#281)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMistral 7B
LMArena Text13191090
LMArena Creative Writing12381068
LMArena Multi-Turn12991062

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Mistral 7B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 22.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or Mistral 7B?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Mistral 7B lists at $0.25 and $0.25.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Mistral 7B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 25.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Granite 4.2 8B does, with 131K tokens against 8K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Mistral 7B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral 7B has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper