Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs MiniMax-M2.5

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.0

Rank #143 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2.5 MiniMax

38.1

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 2 categories and MiniMax-M2.5 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where MiniMax-M2.5 leads 47.9 to 39.9.
  • Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.5.
  • MiniMax-M2.5 accepts more context: 205K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and MiniMax-M2.5 specifications
Granite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
ProviderIBMMiniMax
Noometry Index40.038.1
Released—2026-02-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K205K
Max output118K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$1.20
Results tracked1133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.9 (#53)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Coding13791380
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—75.8%
LMArena WebDev—1386
SWE-bench Multilingual—68.3%
ALE-Bench—618.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 30.2 (#70)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
Terminal-Bench—42.7%
Vending-Bench 2—-23.16

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130), MiniMax-M2.5: 17.6 (#281)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts13271372
ARC-AGI-2—4.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—55.2%
NYT Connections (extended)—16.8%
ARC-AGI-1—63.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.68

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, MiniMax-M2.5: 25.8 (#242)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
ProofBench—4%
LMArena Math—1378

Knowledge Too close to call

Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144), MiniMax-M2.5: 38.6 (#132)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Expert13801378
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.1%

Multilingual MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173), MiniMax-M2.5: 47.3 (#147)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Non-English12991338
LMArena Chinese13611392
LMArena Russian12831359
LMArena French—1363
LMArena German—1361
LMArena Japanese—1169
LMArena Korean—1232
LMArena Spanish—1354

Instruction Following MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183), MiniMax-M2.5: 71.7 (#143)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Instruction Following12981353

Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154), MiniMax-M2.5: 37.4 (#211)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Longer Query13231367
CL-bench—11.4%
CL-bench Life—6.3%

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M2.5 leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183), MiniMax-M2.5: 54.1 (#149)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BMiniMax-M2.5
LMArena Text13191359
LMArena Creative Writing12381331
LMArena Multi-Turn12991364
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1361

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than MiniMax-M2.5?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Granite 4.2 8B or MiniMax-M2.5?

Granite 4.2 8B is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2.5 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or MiniMax-M2.5 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 47.9 versus 39.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax-M2.5 does, with 205K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and MiniMax-M2.5 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.5 has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper