Model comparison

Granite 4.2 8B vs Llama 3-70B

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.0

Rank #143 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.5

Rank #317 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 8B scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 37.7 to 20.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 3-70B specifications
Granite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index40.028.5
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output118K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.06—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked1131

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 39.9 (#138), Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding13791206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 25.5 (#130), Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13271195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.91
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 8B: —, Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
LMArena Math—1218
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 37.7 (#144), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Expert13801149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#173), Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English12991142
LMArena Chinese13611114
LMArena Russian12831159
LMArena French—1231
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#183), Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12981194

Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 40.2 (#154), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query13231174

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads

Granite 4.2 8B: 49.8 (#183), Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 8BLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text13191221
LMArena Creative Writing12381210
LMArena Multi-Turn12991223

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 8B better than Llama 3-70B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.0 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 8B or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 8B and Llama 3-70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 8B has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper