Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

50.3

Rank #48 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 51.3 to 26.0.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Granite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index39.450.3
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1131

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Muse Spark 1.2: 49.2 (#51)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding13611495
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1533
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.4 (#87)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Muse Spark 1.2: 51.3 (#34)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts13061486
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—154.87

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 46.4 (#70)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math—1471

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Muse Spark 1.2: 54.1 (#53)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert13151480
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 43.4 (#25)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision—1305

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.1 (#11)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English12681478
LMArena Chinese12691511
LMArena Russian12491487
LMArena French—1513
LMArena Spanish—1498

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Muse Spark 1.2: 76.7 (#36)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following12731461

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.2 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query12911475

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.3 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12931482
LMArena Creative Writing12051449
LMArena Multi-Turn12901494
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.2 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper