Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Mistral Small

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 26.0 to 19.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Mistral Small specifications
Granite 4.2 3bMistral Small
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index39.433.4
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Coding13611362
SciCode—26.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—36.1%
LiveBench Coding—36.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—46.6%
ALE-Bench—497.62

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.1%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Hard Prompts13061335
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.8%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—44.8%
DTBench—70.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—53.7%
LMCA—20.6%
LiveBench—44%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.8%
LiveBench Math—39.9%
LMArena Math—1341
MATH Level 5—46.8%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Expert13151291
GPQA Diamond—47.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
MMLU—68.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Vision—1142

Multilingual Mistral Small leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Non-English12681315
LMArena Chinese12691340
LMArena Russian12491324
LMArena French—1337
LMArena German—1340
LMArena Japanese—1275
LMArena Korean—1259
LMArena Spanish—1346

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following12731310
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.7%

Long Context Mistral Small leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Longer Query12911327

Writing & Preference Mistral Small leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bMistral Small
LMArena Text12931338
LMArena Creative Writing12051305
LMArena Multi-Turn12901344
LiveBench Language—30.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Mistral Small?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Mistral Small better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Mistral Small share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper