Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Llama 3-8B

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Llama 3-8B Meta

25.3

Rank #338 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-8B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 35.6 to 7.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 3-8B specifications
Granite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index39.025.3
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—8K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.14
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1134

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146), Llama 3-8B: 30.5 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Coding13631152
BigCodeBench Instruct—31.9%
BigCodeBench Complete—36.9%
HumanEval+—56.7%
MBPP+—54.8%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136), Llama 3-8B: 13.8 (#321)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts13081133
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—43.9%
Adversarial NLI—57.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.33
ForecastBench—58.6
WinoGrande—75.7%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama 3-8B: 8.3 (#317)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.9%
LMArena Math—1151
MATH Level 5—6.1%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169), Llama 3-8B: 7.8 (#303)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Expert13131113
GPQA Diamond—26.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—82.8%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—82.6%
TriviaQA—67.7%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193), Llama 3-8B: 31.0 (#256)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Non-English12681098
LMArena Chinese12681076
LMArena Russian12491109
LMArena French—1158
LMArena German—1104
LMArena Japanese—967
LMArena Korean—1003
LMArena Spanish—1172

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195), Llama 3-8B: 58.7 (#255)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12711127

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179), Llama 3-8B: 34.2 (#246)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Longer Query12931128

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202), Llama 3-8B: 37.7 (#251)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-8B
LMArena Text12951166
LMArena Creative Writing12151150
LMArena Multi-Turn12931152

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Llama 3-8B?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 25.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Llama 3-8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 3-8B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-8B has 34.

Related comparisons

Go deeper