Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Llama 3-70B

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Llama 3-70B Meta

28.8

Rank #323 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 7 categories and Llama 3-70B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 36.3 to 20.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 3-70B specifications
Granite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index39.428.8
Released—2024-04-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1131

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Coding13611206
BigCodeBench Instruct—43.6%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.5%
HumanEval+—72%
MBPP+—69%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
Cybench—5%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts13061195
Kagi LLM Benchmark—35.1%
DTBench—54.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—122.93
ForecastBench—57.1
WinoGrande—83.5%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.3%
LMArena Math—1218
MATH Level 5—22.6%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Expert13151149
GPQA Diamond—40.6%
MMLU—79.3%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Non-English12681142
LMArena Chinese12691114
LMArena Russian12491159
LMArena French—1232
LMArena German—1169
LMArena Japanese—1017
LMArena Korean—1017
LMArena Spanish—1241

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12731194

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Longer Query12911174

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 3b leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bLlama 3-70B
LMArena Text12931221
LMArena Creative Writing12051210
LMArena Multi-Turn12901223

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Llama 3-70B?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Llama 3-70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.

Related comparisons

Go deeper