Model comparison

Granite 4.2 3b vs Grok 4.3

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.4

Rank #169 Confirmed

Grok 4.3 xAI

43.8

Rank #86 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 3b scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 36.3.
  • Granite 4.2 3b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4.3 specifications
Granite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index39.443.8
Released—2026-04-17
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2.50
Results tracked1140

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 40.0 (#151), Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Coding13611415
LMArena WebDev—1357
SciCode—47.3%
WeirdML—49.9%
ALE-Bench—944.17

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
GDP.pdf—8%
LMArena Search—1165
Vending-Bench 2—35.26

Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 26.0 (#138), Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Hard Prompts13061396
NYT Connections (extended)—55.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—25%
DTBench—90.7%
LMCA—38.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.16
ForecastBench—60.3

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—42.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—14.6%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
ProofBench—11%
LMArena Math—1388

Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 36.3 (#171), Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Expert13151385
GPQA Diamond—88.8%
SimpleQA Verified—33.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 3b: —, Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Vision—1229
Blueprint-Bench 2—0%

Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 42.1 (#198), Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Non-English12681385
LMArena Chinese12691422
LMArena Russian12491399
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1395
LMArena Japanese—1379
LMArena Korean—1356
LMArena Spanish—1398

Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 67.1 (#200), Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Instruction Following12731366

Long Context Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 39.2 (#185), Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Longer Query12911393

Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads

Granite 4.2 3b: 47.2 (#212), Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 3bGrok 4.3
LMArena Text12931397
LMArena Creative Writing12051380
LMArena Multi-Turn12901406
EQ-Bench 4—1075

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 3b better than Grok 4.3?

Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 3b or Grok 4.3 better for coding?

Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 3b and Grok 4.3 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 3b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.

Related comparisons

Go deeper