Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.4

Rank #126 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 40.4 to 36.2.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
Granite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.437.7
Released—2025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1125

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.2 (#199)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Coding13941413
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.7 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 24.7 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13751372
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 34.9 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1364

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 36.4 (#159)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Expert14051337

Multilingual Too close to call

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.8 (#143)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English13401345
LMArena Chinese14151356
LMArena Russian13421367
LMArena French—1394
LMArena German—1324
LMArena Japanese—1309
LMArena Korean—1307
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Too close to call

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.8 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13461356

Long Context Too close to call

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#126)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13591379

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.5 (#142)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text13631356
LMArena Creative Writing12941333
LMArena Multi-Turn13401365

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.4 to 37.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 36.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper