Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 27.8.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Granite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
ProviderIBMAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index41.856.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding13961502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts13741496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%
LMArena Math—1499

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert14061507
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English13401472
LMArena Chinese14141538
LMArena Russian13431481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following13471479

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query13591489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text13611483
LMArena Creative Writing12881479
LMArena Multi-Turn13391489

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Qwen3.8 Max share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper