Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs o3
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.6 to 39.1.
- Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | o3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 47.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 200K |
| Max output | — | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 63 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), o3: 46.8 (#64)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | 1408 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 62.3% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 58.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 81.3% |
| GSO | — | 8.8% |
| WeirdML | — | 52.4% |
| CadEval | — | 74% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 933.55 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, o3: 34.5 (#44)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 30.8% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 45.2% |
| OSWorld | — | 23% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1144 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 65.4% |
Reasoning o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), o3: 32.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | 1402 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 6.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 53.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 67.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 60.8% |
| CritPt | — | 1.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 13.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 84.8% |
| LMCA | — | 39.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.86 |
| ForecastBench | — | 62.5 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, o3: 50.2 (#58)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 71.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1426 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.8% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 18.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), o3: 54.6 (#52)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | 1402 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 81.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 20.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.4% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 75.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, o3: 41.4 (#36)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1214 |
| GeoBench | — | 74% |
| VPCT | — | 52% |
Multilingual o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), o3: 51.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | 1401 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | 1437 |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | 1406 |
| LMArena French | — | 1430 |
| LMArena German | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1395 |
Instruction Following o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), o3: 72.8 (#127)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | 1368 |
| IFEval | — | 86.9% |
Long Context o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), o3: 53.3 (#6)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | 1372 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 88.9% |
| CL-bench | — | 17.8% |
Writing & Preference o3 leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), o3: 63.5 (#64)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | o3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | 1410 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1405 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1676 |
| WildBench | — | 86.1% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than o3?
o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or o3 better for coding?
o3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and o3 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and o3 has 63.