Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Muse Spark

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Muse Spark Meta

50.6

Rank #46 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Spark leads 65.7 to 39.1.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
ProviderIBMMeta
Noometry Index41.850.6
Released—2026-04-08
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1127

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Muse Spark: 46.2 (#69)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Coding13961481
SciCode—51.5%

Reasoning Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Muse Spark: 35.9 (#67)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Hard Prompts13741474
CritPt—11.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—152.04

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark: 47.8 (#66)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%
ProofBench—17%
LMArena Math—1455
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Muse Spark: 65.7 (#13)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Expert14061457
GPQA Diamond—89.8%
Humanity's Last Exam—40.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Muse Spark: 43.4 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Vision—1306
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Muse Spark: 56.1 (#24)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Non-English13401464
LMArena Chinese14141509
LMArena Russian13431466
LMArena French—1497
LMArena German—1497
LMArena Korean—1459
LMArena Spanish—1472

Instruction Following Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Muse Spark: 75.9 (#51)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Instruction Following13471442

Long Context Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Muse Spark: 44.4 (#69)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Longer Query13591451

Writing & Preference Muse Spark leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Muse Spark: 66.0 (#39)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMuse Spark
LMArena Text13611474
LMArena Creative Writing12881459
LMArena Multi-Turn13391477

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Muse Spark?

Muse Spark is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.6 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Muse Spark better for coding?

Muse Spark scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.2 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Muse Spark share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper