Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Mixtral 8x7B

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Mixtral 8x7B Mistral AI

27.1

Rank #334 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Mixtral 8x7B in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 11.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Mixtral 8x7B specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index41.827.1
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—32K
Max output—32K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked1138

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Mixtral 8x7B: 32.8 (#269)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Coding13961126
HumanEval+—39.6%
MBPP+—49.7%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Mixtral 8x7B: 18.2 (#285)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Hard Prompts13741115
DTBench—49.6%
Adversarial NLI—55.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—118.47
ForecastBench—56.3
HellaSwag—86.7%
PIQA—83.6%
WinoGrande—77.2%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mixtral 8x7B: 18.8 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
Omni-MATH—10.5%
LMArena Math—1147
MATH Level 5—10%
GSM8K—74.4%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Mixtral 8x7B: 11.0 (#301)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Expert14061088
GPQA Diamond—30.6%
MMLU-Pro—33.5%
GPQA (HELM)—29.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—87.3%
MMLU—70.6%
OpenBookQA—85.8%
TriviaQA—82.2%

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Mixtral 8x7B: 29.6 (#266)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Non-English13401077
LMArena Chinese14141055
LMArena Russian13431090
LMArena French—1166
LMArena German—1114
LMArena Japanese—931
LMArena Korean—968
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Mixtral 8x7B: 51.0 (#297)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Instruction Following13471109
IFEval—57.5%

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Mixtral 8x7B: 33.4 (#260)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Longer Query13591103

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Mixtral 8x7B: 34.2 (#270)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMixtral 8x7B
LMArena Text13611132
LMArena Creative Writing12881109
LMArena Multi-Turn13391115
WildBench—67.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mixtral 8x7B?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Mixtral 8x7B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mixtral 8x7B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mixtral 8x7B has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper