Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Mistral Small

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Mistral Small Mistral AI

33.4

Rank #243 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 7 categories and Mistral Small in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 31.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Small specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMistral Small
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index41.833.4
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—256K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.15
Output $ / M tokens—$0.60
Results tracked1139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Mistral Small: 34.0 (#247)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Coding13961362
SciCode—26.5%
BigCodeBench Instruct—36.1%
LiveBench Coding—36.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—46.6%
ALE-Bench—497.62

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Small: 28.1 (#93)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.1%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Mistral Small: 19.8 (#250)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Hard Prompts13741335
Kagi LLM Benchmark—37.8%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—44.8%
DTBench—70.9%
LiveBench Data Analysis—53.7%
LMCA—20.6%
LiveBench—44%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Small: 16.4 (#293)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—5.8%
LiveBench Math—39.9%
LMArena Math—1341
MATH Level 5—46.8%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Mistral Small: 31.0 (#222)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Expert14061291
GPQA Diamond—47.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.1%
MMLU—68.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Small: 33.5 (#96)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Vision—1142

Multilingual Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Mistral Small: 45.5 (#169)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Non-English13401315
LMArena Chinese14141340
LMArena Russian13431324
LMArena French—1337
LMArena German—1340
LMArena Japanese—1275
LMArena Korean—1259
LMArena Spanish—1346

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Mistral Small: 66.4 (#209)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Instruction Following13471310
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.7%

Long Context Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Mistral Small: 40.4 (#156)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Longer Query13591327

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Mistral Small: 52.5 (#171)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Small
LMArena Text13611338
LMArena Creative Writing12881305
LMArena Multi-Turn13391344
LiveBench Language—30.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mistral Small?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Mistral Small better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Small share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper