Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Mistral Medium

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Mistral Medium Mistral AI

36.3

Rank #218 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 3 categories and Mistral Medium in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 39.1 to 25.0.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Medium specifications
Granite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
ProviderIBMMistral AI
Noometry Index41.836.3
Released—2023-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Mistral Medium: 34.2 (#243)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Coding13961434
FrontierCode—8%
SciCode—40.2%
WeirdML—43.7%
ALE-Bench—763.98

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Medium: 28.3 (#90)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—37.7%

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Mistral Medium: 24.0 (#167)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Hard Prompts13741426
Kagi LLM Benchmark—50%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—75.5%
LMCA—26.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—26.9%

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Medium: 28.1 (#245)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—32.2%
ProofBench—9%
LMArena Math—1408
MATH Level 5—81.6%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Mistral Medium: 25.0 (#265)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Expert14061408
GPQA Diamond—59.5%
Humanity's Last Exam—4.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—22.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Mistral Medium: 35.3 (#88)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Vision—1172

Multilingual Mistral Medium leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Mistral Medium: 52.1 (#91)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Non-English13401408
LMArena Chinese14141447
LMArena Russian13431411
LMArena French—1459
LMArena German—1432
LMArena Japanese—1378
LMArena Korean—1380
LMArena Spanish—1433

Instruction Following Mistral Medium leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Mistral Medium: 73.7 (#116)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Instruction Following13471398

Long Context Mistral Medium leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Mistral Medium: 42.9 (#114)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Longer Query13591406

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Mistral Medium: 60.0 (#103)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bMistral Medium
LMArena Text13611424
LMArena Creative Writing12881391
LMArena Multi-Turn13391418
Short-Story Creative Writing—77.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Mistral Medium?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 36.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Mistral Medium better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 34.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Mistral Medium share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper