Model comparison
Granite 4.2 30b vs Magistral Small
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.2 30b leads 27.8 to 6.8.
Side by side
| Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 30.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 11 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1396 | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1374 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: —, Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads
Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1406 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1340 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1414 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1343 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1347 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1359 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.2 30b | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1361 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Magistral Small?
Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.2 30b or Magistral Small better for coding?
Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.