Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Grok 4 Fast

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Grok 4 Fast xAI

39.4

Rank #167 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Grok 4 Fast leads 63.2 to 41.4.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4 Fast specifications
Granite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index41.839.4
Released—2025-09-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1130

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126), Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Coding13961429
LMArena WebDev—1159
WeirdML—42.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
τ²-bench Banking—15.7%
Cybench—30%
LMArena Search—1171

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112), Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts13741412
ARC-AGI-2—5.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.1%
ARC-AGI-1—48.5%
DTBench—82.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.2
ForecastBench—60.5

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Math—1419

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138), Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Expert14061411
Vectara Hallucination Rate—19.7%

Multilingual Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151), Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Non-English13401396
LMArena Chinese14141457
LMArena Russian13431389
LMArena French—1431
LMArena German—1383
LMArena Japanese—1352
LMArena Korean—1357
LMArena Spanish—1415

Instruction Following Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155), Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following13471387

Long Context Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140), Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Longer Query13591415
Fiction.LiveBench—94.4%

Writing & Preference Grok 4 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156), Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4 Fast
LMArena Text13611407
LMArena Creative Writing12881387
LMArena Multi-Turn13391414

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Grok 4 Fast?

Granite 4.2 30b is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 39.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4 Fast share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.

Related comparisons

Go deeper