Model comparison

Granite 4.2 30b vs Grok 4.1 Fast

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.1 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.4

Rank #126 Confirmed

Grok 4.1 Fast xAI

40.9

Rank #131 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.2 30b scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4.1 Fast in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.1 Fast leads 42.3 to 26.7.
  • Granite 4.2 30b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.1 Fast specifications
Granite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
ProviderIBMxAI
Noometry Index41.440.9
Released—2025-06-27
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—30K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.20
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1132

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 40.4 (#127), Grok 4.1 Fast: 33.8 (#236)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Coding13941411
LMArena WebDev—1241
ALE-Bench—394.93

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.1 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—69.6%
τ²-bench Banking—13.1%
LMArena Search—1171
Vending-Bench 2—1,107

Reasoning Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 26.7 (#114), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.3 (#45)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Hard Prompts13751407
SimpleBench—56%
NYT Connections (extended)—87.4%
DTBench—87.7%
ForecastBench—61

Math Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 30.9 (#201)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—60.9%
ProofBench—4%
LMArena Math—1408

Knowledge Granite 4.2 30b leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 38.5 (#134), Grok 4.1 Fast: 32.6 (#203)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Expert14051398
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 4.2 30b: —, Grok 4.1 Fast: 36.3 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Vision—1201

Multilingual Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 47.4 (#146), Grok 4.1 Fast: 51.1 (#110)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Non-English13401391
LMArena Chinese14151441
LMArena Russian13421387
LMArena French—1416
LMArena German—1404
LMArena Japanese—1347
LMArena Korean—1361
LMArena Spanish—1411

Instruction Following Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 71.3 (#150), Grok 4.1 Fast: 72.8 (#127)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Instruction Following13461376

Long Context Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#135), Grok 4.1 Fast: 42.4 (#121)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Longer Query13591390

Writing & Preference Grok 4.1 Fast leads

Granite 4.2 30b: 54.3 (#147), Grok 4.1 Fast: 57.4 (#126)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.2 30bGrok 4.1 Fast
LMArena Text13631408
LMArena Creative Writing12941394
LMArena Multi-Turn13401389
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1327

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.2 30b better than Grok 4.1 Fast?

Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.1 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (41.4 vs 40.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Granite 4.2 30b or Grok 4.1 Fast better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.2 30b and Grok 4.1 Fast share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.2 30b has 11 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.1 Fast has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper