Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 3 leads 40.1 to 30.1.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.4 | 40.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1312 | 1367 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1192 | — |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1293 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
Math Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1312 | 1366 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1309 | 1333 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1177 |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1337 | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1331 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1269 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1371 |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1269 | 1332 |
Long Context Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | 1326 |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1290 | 1350 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1251 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1268 | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Step 3 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.