Model comparison
Granite 4.1 8b vs Qwen3 8B
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 24.6 to 16.1.
Side by side
| Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.8 | 33.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 8B leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291), Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1190 | — |
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1313 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: —, Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads
Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142), Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1294 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |
Math Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167), Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1311 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1310 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1261 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1335 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1238 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1268 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188), Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1275 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199), Qwen3 8B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.1 8b | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1249 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1269 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Qwen3 8B?
Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.1 8b or Qwen3 8B better for coding?
Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Qwen3 8B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.