Model comparison

Granite 4.1 8b vs Phi-4

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

37.4

Rank #205 Confirmed

Phi-4 Microsoft

31.2

Rank #279 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.1 8b scores higher in 7 categories and Phi-4 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 36.4 to 20.8.

Side by side

Granite 4.1 8b and Phi-4 specifications
Granite 4.1 8bPhi-4
ProviderIBMMicrosoft
Noometry Index37.431.2
Released—2024-12-11
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.07
Output $ / M tokens—$0.14
Results tracked1337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi-4 leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 30.1 (#297), Phi-4: 34.4 (#239)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Coding13121231
LMArena WebDev1192—
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—30.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 4.1 8b: —, Phi-4: 22.8 (#128)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.8%
BALROG—11.6%

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 25.7 (#143), Phi-4: 17.7 (#291)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Hard Prompts12931220
Chess Puzzles—1%
LiveBench Reasoning—47.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—45.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—130.42
LiveBench—41.6%

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.4 (#166), Phi-4: 20.8 (#285)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Math13121246
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—13.8%
LiveBench Math—42%
MATH Level 5—64.9%

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 36.1 (#174), Phi-4: 32.6 (#209)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Expert13091203
GPQA Diamond—56.1%
Confabulations—29.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—3.7%
MMLU—84.8%

Multilingual Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 41.7 (#204), Phi-4: 37.2 (#237)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Non-English12611197
LMArena Chinese13371212
LMArena Russian12401209
LMArena French—1224
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1158
LMArena Korean—1151
LMArena Spanish—1234

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 66.9 (#203), Phi-4: 60.4 (#251)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Instruction Following12691201
LiveBench Instruction Following—58.4%

Long Context Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#193), Phi-4: 36.9 (#226)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Longer Query12751217

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Granite 4.1 8b: 48.1 (#204), Phi-4: 40.5 (#244)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 4.1 8bPhi-4
LMArena Text12901217
LMArena Creative Writing12511182
LMArena Multi-Turn12681206
Short-Story Creative Writing—62.6%
LiveBench Language—25.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 4.1 8b better than Phi-4?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 4.1 8b or Phi-4 better for coding?

Phi-4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 4.1 8b and Phi-4 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.1 8b has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi-4 has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper